(Been feeling kind of crappy lately, so I didn’t want to do this. Sorry about that.)
“Adolescence is best enjoyed without self-consciousness, but self-consciousness, unfortunately, it its leading symptom. Even when something happens to you, even when your heart’s getting crushed or exalted, even when you’re absorbed in building the foundations of your personality, there come these moments when you’re aware what’s happening is not the real story. Unless you actually die, the real story is still ahead of you. this alone, this cruel mixture of consciousness and irrelavance, this built-in hollowness, is enough to account for how pissed off you are. You’re miserable and ashamed if you don’t believe your adolescent troubles matter, but you’re stupid if you do. [...]
But when does the real story start? At forty-five, I feel grateful almost daily to be the adult I wished I could be when I was seventeen. [...] At the same time, almost daily, I lose battles with the seventeen-year-old who’s still inside me. [...]
The double bind, the problem of consciousness mixed with nothingness, never goes away. You never stop waiting for the real story to start, because the real story, in the end, is that you die.”
-The Discomfort Zone by Jonathan Franzen
The book itself was not actually that good. The beginning was good, but once he started talking about his love affair with bird watching, he lost me.
The first Jonathan Franzen book I read, How to be Alone, was really good. At least I really liked it, but it seems that a look at the GoodReads page for the book, I am in the minority*.
How to be Alone is a collection of essays from the mid-nineties and argues for the virtues of being alone. You can see how this could appeal to me.
To clarify: I’m not anti-social. In fact, I’m really kind of pro-social. To a degree. I like meeting new people and I like going to parties and I like talking to be people. I’m not opposed to socialization in the slightest.
But I hate things that social people like, it seems. For example, cell phones.
I hate being able to be reached at all hours of the day. So I turn it off or I don’t bring it with me. Then I get yelled at for not having my phone on me, or not picking it up, etc.
Sometimes I just want to be left alone. I don’t want to be having four different conversations going on at the same time. I don’t need that. Maybe other people like it. I don’t.
A lot of people guy this guy elitist, or out-of-date. One review argues that the world is a different place since 9/11, and since these essays are written before that, they’re obsolete. Which is completely ridiculous. I mean, how many books were written before September 11th, 2001? Are all of those books “obsolete”? What about all the books that were written before American even existed? Yes, the language is a bit outdated, but that doesn’t mean the content is less relevant**.
I am interested in the virtues of being alone, but it seems that I’m part of the minority once again. Perhaps why this book isn’t really well liked. People seem to think that being alone is bad, but there’s a difference between being alone and being lonely.
And now we reach the point where I’m pretty sure that I’m not making any sense. Just read it. You probably won’t like it. I like it. The end.
Goodnight.
-Laura
*My favorite part of the reviews are the people they recommend the books to. “Elderly techno-phobes”, “boring magazine enthusiasts”, and “anyone with an hour to kill” are featured here. Good to know what demographic I’m reading in. I like on the page for Twilight, a lot of the recommendations say things like “No one, not even my worst enemy”.
I have to say that posting a two-page long diatribe against a book on its GoodReads page has to be probably one the most pathetic things I’ve seen a person do.
**See: Catcher in the Rye.